May 17, 2011 |
print-button

Industry Pushes for Science-Based Salmonella Regulations

IFEEDER helps fund the Salmonella in Feed Research Coalition to aid in developing sound policies.

In August 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a long-awaited Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) on Salmonella in feed. CPGs provide to FDA’s field staff interpretations of laws and regulations and represent current thinking on enforcement and compliance. For the first time since 1975, the agency completely overhauled its stance and agreed to separate human food from animal feed with respect to enforcement of Salmonella regulations.

This conclusion is consistent with long-standing science documenting that pathogenic Salmonella in feed is rare for both animal and human health. However, additional research is needed to confirm this approach and further develop regulatory policies surrounding Salmonella.

To help the industry and government reach a science-based consensus, the Institute for Feed Education & Research (IFEEDER), a 501 (c)(3) charitable foundation formed to address future challenges to the feed industry, has made a charitable donation to the Salmonella in Feed Research Coalition. Their donation will leverage additional funding to support surveys, lab tests and field tests at the Food and Feed Safety Research Unit at the Southwest Plains Area lab in College Station, TX.

FDA updates Salmonella guidelines

For nearly 35 years, the FDA has stated that feed found to have any Salmonella serotype (a distinct variation within a subspecies of bacteria) present would be deemed adulterated. However, according to Richard Sellers, corporate secretary, IFEEDER, the common Salmonella serotypes found in feed are generally not pathogenic in animals and are even less likely to be pathogenic in humans. 

The agency’s former stance, a no-holds-bar approach to regulating Salmonella, was neither science based, nor good for industry. 

“In 2008 the FDA detected [a nonpathogenic] Salmonella in several canola meal shipments from three of the largest suppliers in Canada,” Sellers says. “The FDA seized and held those shipments, costing our dairy industry $127 million in New England alone.” 

Unfortunate situations due to poor policy-making, like the dairy example, prompted the FDA to issue a new Salmonella CPG last summer, taking a brand new approach to regulating Salmonella in feed. 

“There are some Salmonella strains, as outlined in the new CPG, that are more of a human food safety concern than an animal feed safety concern,” says Steve Traylor, global director of regulatory affairs, Alltech. “It’s taken years of education, both by the American Feed Industry Association (AFIA) and other trade associations, for FDA to consider a serotype-specific Salmonella regulation, and it’s a huge victory for the industry and for science.” 

Now, Salmonella is appropriately broken into allowable serotypes by species, clearly outlined for poultry, beef, dairy, horse and sheep feed.

The FDA is close to finalizing the CPG, but although it’s viewed as a victory for the feed industry, there is still more research needed to fully understand Salmonella's impact on the safety of our food supply. 

“We’re pleased with the outcome of this policy, but as it was developing, we realized we needed more information on Salmonella to make truly sound regulations,” says Sellers. “The data on Salmonella in feed over the last 15 years is pretty lean, so we’d like to leverage some funding to research Salmonella and its various serotypes.” 

Feed industry seeks answers 

In 2007, the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) released an experts meeting report titled Animal Feed Impact on Food Safety. The report noted there was not sufficient data to draw conclusions about the carryover of Salmonella from feed to food.

Much of the uncertainty revolves around the pathogencity of different Salmonella serotypes. Although the FDA’s CPG lays out the specific serotypes that will be regulated in feed, there are many lesser-known Salmonella characteristics yet to learn about. The main questions are which serotypes pose a risk to human health and at what level does the risk become serious.

“One of our objectives is to find the distinction between pathogenic Salmonella and nonpathogenic Salmonella,” says Sellers. “But it’s going to take work because pathogenicity depends on level of exposure, duration of exposure and other factors. Additionally, Salmonella is an incredibly adaptive bug and mutates rapidly, therefore different genetic variations — even within a serotype — may be pathogenic at one farm and harmless at another.”

IFEEDER starts coalition

In response to the need for more Salmonella data, IFEEDER and other industry organizations including the National Grain and Feed Association, Canola Council of Canada, the National Renderers Association and U.S. Poultry and Egg Association, formed the Salmonella in Feed Research Coalition.

This summer, the coalition will hold its first meeting among FDA, academia and other industry stakeholders to identify the most crucial gaps in information and formulate ways to gather the data.

“When you work with salmonella and you start to look for data, it usually raises more questions than answers,” says Sellers. “We’ll likely start by taking an anonymous survey of feed and feed ingredients from around the United States to find out what types of Salmonella are actually in the marketplace. IFEEDER’s $15,000 donation will leverage another $60,000, and that funding will carry the project for about two years.”

Using the data from the survey, a research team within the coalition consisting of scientists from academia, USDA-Agriculture Research Service (ARS) and industry will collectively decide a research protocol, collect the necessary samples, analyze the data and decide what should be done with the results.

World looks to U.S. for policy guidance

Alltech’s Traylor hopes the results lead to more effective regulations for the industry and consumers, both domestically and abroad.

“The work being done by the Salmonella in Feed Research Coalition will lead to more effective regulating that doesn’t disregard the scientific knowledge available,” says Traylor. “The amazing thing is this is also going to reach out into the international market because a lot of foreign regulatory bodies are looking to the FDA for guidance, as the United States is one of the leaders in food and feed safety.”

IFEEDER and the rest of the Salmonella in Feed Research Coalition will remain dedicated to securing the safety of the world’s food and feed supply through its donations to the project. 

More Articles

Beyond OSHA Combustible Dust Compliance
Star Milling uses a VAC-U-MAX breakaway central vacuum system, that meets OSHA's requirements for a combustible dust vacuum, to keep its facility clean and compliant. Photo by Air Cleaning Technology

Beyond OSHA Combustible Dust Compliance

November 24, 2014 | Online Exclusive |

Feed mill employs portable combustible dust central vacuum to remove fugitive grain dust and eliminates the need to enter confined spaces for cleaning.

[Read More]
Feed Industry Invests in Education
The Northern Crops Institute, located on the campus of North Dakota State University in Fargo, ND, has educated visitors from more than 130 countries.

Feed Industry Invests in Education

November 11, 2014 | Cover Story | Elise Schafer

The Northern Crops Institute renovates its feed mill on North Dakota State University’s Fargo campus with state-of-the-art equipment donated by feed industry suppliers.

[Read More]
Feeding Signals: The 
Cows Say it All

Feeding Signals: The 
Cows Say it All

October 28, 2014 | Online Exclusive |

Feeding perfect rations is only possible when you understand feed analysis, the properties of the feed, the way a cow functions and her milk production. The concept 'Feeding signals' looks at all these aspects: from mouth to rumen and intestines. In this article we touch on a few things to consider when using this concept.

[Read More]