July 24, 2012 | Jackie Roembke
print-button

Food Defense: Is Your Company Secure?

In January, during my visit to Two Rivers Cooperative, general manager Tracy Gatham described the cooperative's partnership with local law enforcement to combat methamphetamine production in rural Iowa. In addition to securing the perimeter with basic security measures, the cooperative, in conjunction with Iowa's "Stop Meth" program, began the practice of adding calcium nitrate to its anhydrous ammonia tanks. The method, developed by researchers at Iowa State University (ISU), creates a "chemical lock" that renders the ammonia useless to meth cooks.

Admittedly, this was the first time I had heard about any of this since all I know about this sort of illicit production is from the AMC show, Breaking Bad. Ultimately, this conversation got me thinking about facility security.

Since the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) requires all company's servicing the food chain to develop a food safety plan a la FSMA, Section 103, I decided it was an appropriate time do delve into strategies for critically analyzing and mitigating internal and external security threats. I'd like to share excerpts from an interview with Don Hsieh, director of commercial and industrial marketing with Tyco Integrated Security. When asked where agribusinesses should begin to reevaluating their existing security programs, Hsieh suggested they start with the four common ares of vulnerability: 

1) Coating, mixing, grinding, rework areas: These steps in any process can result in the even distribution of a contaminant and can cause greater damage rather than an isolated batch or load;
2) Ingredients staging: A stage in the process that provides access to the production stream;
3) Bulk liquid receiving and loading: There is a high probability of uniform mixing and distribution of a contaminant;
4) Bulk liquid storage or non-bulk liquid holding: Tanks tend to be kept in isolated areas, allowing for easy access to adulteration.

He suggests the best approach to proactive food defense is to assess the measures being taken in these sensitive areas evaluating who has authorization to be in them and how a criminal elements could access the product. After the site has been assessed and access points have been identified, determine alert systems does the company have in place to notify management or staff that there is an incident.

"Anytime there is an incident, the faster the response to the incident the quicker the recovery," Hsieh says, noting that alerts range from testing to virtual products like cameras or the use of RFID technology.

The final step is auditing the security measures you have implemented so "you don't think you're in compliance, you know you're in compliance."

While the specifics of site security, rely heavily on the site itself, starting with the basics is the best way to protect your business and the food supply.

More Articles

Tracking Ingredient Activity to Empower Business Decisions

Tracking Ingredient Activity to Empower Business Decisions

March 25, 2015 | Focus On |

With the establishment of its Information Technology Innovation Award, the American Feed Industry Association (AFIA), in partnership with AgGateway and Feed & Grain magazine, recognizes leading feed and grain industry companies that incorporate new, advanced technologies in their routine business practices to help meet the demand of a rapidly developing world population. 

[Read More]
Applying  Exceptional  Customer Service to Feed and  Grain Businesses

Applying Exceptional Customer Service to Feed and Grain Businesses

March 19, 2015 | DepartmentsManager's Notebook | Dr John Foltz

 Some folks may argue that superior customer service might be more important for retail stores, rather than a business like a grain elevator or feed mill. But it can make a difference in the competitive feed and grain industry — for the very reason that it is competitive. You do have competitors, and attracting and keeping more business is a desirable strategy.

[Read More]
A New Benchmark for Grain Elevators

A New Benchmark for Grain Elevators

March 10, 2015 | Cover Story | Steven Kilger

Though known for its inclement weather and dairy production, according to the USDA’s Crop Production Summary for 2013, Wisconsin was ninth in corn production and 15th in soybean production, despite having a wet harvest season. Looking at what the members of Landmark Services Cooperative needed now, and looking forward to what they will need in the future, the co-op built a new grain facility in Fall River, WI, to give them plenty of speed, space and markets — everything a farmer needs to grow.... [Read More]