February 05, 2010 |
print-button

An Editor’s Dilemma

Prior to becoming the editor of FEED & GRAIN, admittedly, my exposure to agriculture was limited; however, for what I lack in experience, I can offer something equally as valuable: an outsider’s objectivity.

In September, Michael Pollan, the controversial — and highly visible — author of books such as The Omnivore’s Dilemma and, most recently, Food Rules, spoke to a crowd of roughly 7,000 at the University of Wisconsin. Those in attendance ranged from students to farmers to curious onlookers wondering what all the fuss was about. I was one of the later.

Despite your feelings about Pollan or his work, he does make one profound and inarguable point: The public doesn’t know how their food is produced or the means by which it is brought to their table.

The critics of agriculture have been vocal, organized and aggressive; agriculture — and all segments of this industry — have taken these blows.

Honestly, prior to attending the USPOULTRY’s education program “Animal Agriculture Under Attack” at IPE/IFE, the only viewpoint of animal agriculture I’d ever been exposed to was indeed the opinion of the opposition. (For more coverage of this event, see “Food For Thought” on page 71.)

The main message of these presentations: “Don’t let others define us.”

This notion was echoed at a fundraising event sponsored by the Institute for Feed Education and Research (IFEEDER), a non-profit foundation created by the American Feed Industry Association whose goal is to sustain the future of food and feed production through education, research and technology. The reality of the future of agriculture was made clear: 50-100-70. Meaning, in 50 years agriculture will need to produce 100% more food to feed the world’s population (projected to reach 9 billion by 2050) and 70% of that increased production will only be made possible through advancement in agriculture technology.

Presenter Dean Warras, president of Prince Agri Products and IFEEDER’s Board of Trustees Vice Chairman, said: “Education will teach the world about what we’re doing and how we’re doing it. We need to communicate accurate facts about food animal production to the media and the public by strategically aligning the entities. We are to blame for not educating the public.”

Perhaps consider this editorial a call to action, one to motivate you to be vocal about the services you provide and our place on the “food chain.” Regardless, as I become educated, I’m making it my personal mission to do just that.

To learn more about IFEEDER and its effort, turn to page 68 or visit its website, www.IFEEDER.org.

More Articles

Beyond OSHA Combustible Dust Compliance
Star Milling uses a VAC-U-MAX breakaway central vacuum system, that meets OSHA's requirements for a combustible dust vacuum, to keep its facility clean and compliant. Photo by Air Cleaning Technology

Beyond OSHA Combustible Dust Compliance

November 24, 2014 | Online Exclusive |

Feed mill employs portable combustible dust central vacuum to remove fugitive grain dust and eliminates the need to enter confined spaces for cleaning.

[Read More]
Feed Industry Invests in Education
The Northern Crops Institute, located on the campus of North Dakota State University in Fargo, ND, has educated visitors from more than 130 countries.

Feed Industry Invests in Education

November 11, 2014 | Cover Story | Elise Schafer

The Northern Crops Institute renovates its feed mill on North Dakota State University’s Fargo campus with state-of-the-art equipment donated by feed industry suppliers.

[Read More]
Feeding Signals: The 
Cows Say it All

Feeding Signals: The 
Cows Say it All

October 28, 2014 | Online Exclusive |

Feeding perfect rations is only possible when you understand feed analysis, the properties of the feed, the way a cow functions and her milk production. The concept 'Feeding signals' looks at all these aspects: from mouth to rumen and intestines. In this article we touch on a few things to consider when using this concept.

[Read More]